Disarming Innocent People Does Not Protect Innocent People
Disarming Innocent People Does Not Protect Innocent People
Disarming innocent people does not portect innocent people. We founders call this one the theory of ‘DUH’....
If a madman wants to kill innocent people he will find a way. Killers don’t need guns to kill people. Timothy McVeigh used fertilizer. 9-11 terrorists used box cutters & planes. The Nazis used cyanide gas… Taking guns from innocent people will not protect innocent people....
During 1992 LA riots, police and the National Guard couldn’t protect everyone from mobs of murderers, arsonists and looters. Ordinary Americans with guns stopped the rampaging mobs, saving countless innocent lives....
Meanwhile at a school in Israel; armed teachers protect children from assailants....
You need guns to protect you from whom? It’s not like the government would shoot your wife in the head....
s gun in the hand is better than 20 cops on the phone
@dadramsey Disarming the citizens is to prevent any chance of an armed citizen’s uprising.
“: Disarming Innocent People Does Not Protect Innocent People – http://t.co/IMiHI784Fx” Amen
Disarming politicians from their brains is the best way to protect people.
As the recent school shooting proved! Not one Gun Controller has done anything to protect our children, they are Traitors!
This deserves to be translated to any language
but it makes the criminal’s job a whole lot easier if people are disarmed. 🙂
Had to share that one! It’s now featured on http://t.co/2hi6n2lvTA
it only stops self-defense .criminals always find weapons illegally
Disarming innocent people protects tyrants
oh yes, you’re right. It is great fact, can’t be denied.
right
Disarming innocent people? I must have missed this on the news! They [the Government] has not come to my house yet.
Gotta post this in response… sorry https://t.co/FPqHanr56N